At times it appears that some of Pennsylvania’s legislators –
too often even a majority – just can’t pass up a chance to demonstrate how
little they know or care about natural resources. Just two examples from the
past few months –
The “Endangered
Species Coordination Act” (House Bill 1576 and Senate Bill 1047) which would
require all species of plants, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, mollusks,
and insects now on the state list of rare, threatened or endangered species to
be re-listed within two years or loose their designation. In addition the
re-listings would have to go through a lengthy regulatory review process by an
agency with no expertise in any biological science, and subject to the
political machinations of the legislature.
Showy Ladys-slipper |
Hundreds of
species of concern, but not yet rare, threatened or endangered, would
immediately be eliminated from any consideration in permit applications for
mining, drilling or construction. Those are species that are rare in
Pennsylvania, but may be more common elsewhere. Protecting uncommon species in
the states is an excellent way to prevent them from becoming listed under the
Federal Endangered Species Act. But the proposed legislation would appear to
protect only those species already on the Federal list.
Another ridiculous
provision of the bills would open the database, including the locations, of
rare species to anyone who took the time to look. So, any unscrupulous
collectors of rare plants, dealers in unusual reptiles, or developers who
wanted to eliminate an impediment would have ready access.
The U.S.
Fish & Wildlife Service has warned that the Game Commission (which oversees
mammals and birds) and the Fish & Boat Commission (which has responsibility
for fish, reptiles and amphibians, mollusks, and aquatic insects) would loose a
total of $27,500,000 in Federal funding for wildlife programs if these bills
are enacted.
Spotlighting
the legislature’s ignorance is that one of the bills’ prime sponsors was
prompted by the cost of mitigating the impacts of a project in his district on
a Federally listed species, a requirement that wouldn’t change one iota if
these bills were enacted. DUMB!
Balsam Poplar |
Currently, Pennsylvania allows coyote hunting year-round with no limit on how many coyotes an individual hunter may kill. The data is incomplete, but there are estimates that in 2013 hunters killed more than 40,000 coyotes in the state. It doesn’t take a mathematical genius to figure out that $700,000 wouldn’t even be adequate to pay bounties on the number of coyotes already being killed. Of course that $700,000 would have to come out of productive wildlife management programs or wildlife law enforcement.
Bounties have been paid on coyotes in western states for decades without significantly reducing their population. Coyotes have such a high reproductive potential that 70 percent of the population would have to be removed each year to cause the population to decline. Nebraska’s coyote population kept rising throughout 68 years of paying bounties and Missouri had its highest coyote kill 31 years after beginning bounties. Only a fool would think that Pennsylvania would be any different.
It’s well known that coyotes have a compensatory response to population fluctuations – if their population is low and food plentiful more offspring survive and vice-versa. Bounties, indeed any hunting, tend to eliminate the young and dumb animals – and the smart, wary, more nocturnal and adaptable animals survive to breed a “super coyote”.
Now it’s time to get off the soapbox and go back to photographing wildlife.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for visiting "In Forest and Field" and thank you especially for commenting. It's always interesting to see other peoples' thoughts. Unfortunately, due to spam and trolls (not the kind living beneath bridges), comments must now be approved before being posted.
Woody