The
first clue was a feather in a ski track on the old road. The feather
could have been easy to ignore because birds lose feathers for many
different reasons –
A
short distance further along, the road passes an old borrow pit where
fill material had been removed in the past; in the middle of the
clearing in the Big
Woods
formed by the borrow pit was a large mass of feathers –
For
a life-long nature snooper this called for an investigation. There
were no tracks on the snow-covered ground that led to the pile of
feathers, at least there weren’t until I walked over to take a better
look and
left my own tracks there.
Here's a closer look at the
feathers which were on and around a slightly elevated mound. The mound is a clue to the killer's identity –
To
set the stage a bit:
The
ground had been bare in the Big Woods, but beginning the afternoon of the
16th through the morning of the 17th
the
Big Woods received 22-24 inches of snow. The
following days were cold, but the 22nd
was
much warmer; between the snow compacting, sublimating and melting
there was only about nine inches on the ground on the 23rd
when I found the feathers.
The
feathers were the key to the identity of the deceased, there were
some red feathers –
And
scattered
primary feathers from the wings –
The
primary
feathers were the key to determining that the deceased
was a pileated woodpecker, age and sex undetermined.
A lot of feathers were on top of the snow and apparently none were below
the surface. So,
the death must have occurred after it stopped snowing on the 17th,
but that didn’t tell us much. On the 20th
there was a fine dusting of snow, but there was no snow on top
of
the feathers. The temperature was barely above freezing until the
afternoon of the 22nd, when it was partly sunny and in the mid-40s
for several hours, a few of the black feathers had sunk a short way into the snow or settled into old depressions.
The
night of the 22nd
was below freezing and the snow had a slight crust into which some of
the feathers had lightly frozen. So, it appears that the deed was
done early
on
the 22nd.
Now
we’ve determined the identity of the deceased and the date and
time
of death, it just remains to identify the killer. In several areas
around the pile of feathers there were wing marks in the snow –
Those
wing marks narrow it
down
to an aerial predator – a hawk or an owl. Pileated woodpeckers
aren’t nocturnal; in fact, like all woodpeckers, they spend nights
in a tree cavity. That reduces the odds of the killer being an owl as
does the large quantity of feathers removed after the
woodpecker was killed, owls usually only remove the largest feathers
before dining –
So
the killer was almost certainly a hawk that caught the woodpecker as it was flying across the clearing. It probably wasn't a red-tailed hawk nor a
red-shouldered hawk since neither is fast or agile enough to easily
catch a woodpecker in flight. That leaves us with either a goshawk or
perhaps
a very large Coopers hawk as the probable killer. Since goshawks have
nested in the surrounding forest and the smaller Coopers hawk would
be less likely to attack a bird as large as a pileated woodpecker, the
deed was probably done by a goshawk. Goshawks,
like this immature, are the largest of the bird-eating hawks, the
Accipiters –
Accipiters are fast and agile and like to carry their prey to an elevated perch (remember the slight mound?). Similarly, the crow-sized pileated woodpecker is the largest of the
North American woodpeckers –
Thus
we can
deduce the
probable identities
of the protagonists in this woodland drama.
This
is not a mystery worthy of Sherlock Holmes nor is it a murder
mystery, it’s not even the story of a crime – it’s just how a
pileated woodpecker died and a hawk got a meal.
Note
– Predators are not “vicious”, “cruel”, “bloodthirsty”
or any of the similar adjectives that have been applied to them over
the centuries. They are no different than the robin eating the
earthworm, the warbler eating the caterpillar nor those of us who
enjoy a turkey dinner on Thanksgiving Day. They’re doing what they
evolved to do and could no more change how they obtain a meal than we
could stop the ocean’s tides.